In a powerful example of citizen rights and judicial intervention, a man in Jharkhand who had been living without electricity for 60 days finally saw relief after the High Court ruled in his favor and directed immediate restoration of his power connection.
A Common Man’s Struggle
The resident, from Dumka district, had been facing extreme hardship as his repeated requests to the local electricity department went unheard. His grievances included:
No official explanation for disconnection
Multiple complaints to state electricity board offices
Family forced to rely on candles and battery lights
Loss of perishable goods and daily inconvenience
High Court Steps In
Taking the matter to the Jharkhand High Court, the man’s petition highlighted:
Violation of basic rights
Inaction by state power authorities
Urgency due to elderly and children in the household
The court took serious note of the situation, slamming the “bureaucratic apathy” and ordered:
Immediate reconnection of power supply
Show-cause notice to the responsible electricity department officials
Larger Impact
This case has sparked broader conversations about:
Access to electricity as a fundamental right
Need for accountability in utility services
Citizens using the judiciary to challenge administrative failure
FAQs
Q: Why was the electricity disconnected?
A: The specific reason is unclear, but the disconnection was deemed unjustified by the court.
Q: What did the High Court do?
A: It ordered immediate restoration and sought accountability from electricity officials.
Q: How long was the family without power?
A: For over 60 days, despite repeated complaints.
Q: Can citizens approach courts in similar cases?
A: Yes, courts can be approached when essential services are denied without cause.
published on 28th june
Publisher : SMITA
www.vizzve.com || www.vizzveservices.com
Follow us on social media: Facebook || Linkedin || Instagram
🛡 Powered by Vizzve Financial
RBI-Registered Loan Partner | 10 Lakh+ Customers | ₹600 Cr+ Disbursed