Delhi Riots Case Hearing: Accused Invokes Gandhian Philosophy in Supreme Court
In a significant development in the Delhi riots case, the Supreme Court on Monday heard arguments where one of the accused invoked Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of peaceful defiance. The defense argued that peaceful resistance to unjust laws should not be equated with incitement or violence, invoking Gandhi’s principles of non-violence (Ahimsa) and civil disobedience as part of the accused’s defense strategy.
The accused emphasized that Gandhian ideology supports lawful dissent and peaceful protest, not violence. The counsel submitted that the prosecution’s interpretation of dissent as incitement undermines the constitutional right to free speech and protest under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution.
The Supreme Court bench, while hearing the submissions, stated that freedom of expression must coexist with public order and asked the defense to clarify how Gandhian ideals applied within the context of the violent incidents during the riots.
Legal experts noted that this case could set a new precedent in interpreting the boundary between dissent and disruption. The hearing also drew attention to the role of ideology and philosophy in contemporary legal arguments, especially in politically sensitive cases.
The Delhi riots case has been under the judiciary’s scrutiny since 2020, with several accused individuals awaiting trial. The next hearing is expected to focus on the admissibility of evidence and the intent behind protest-related actions.
FAQs
1. What was the main argument presented by the accused in the Delhi riots case?
The accused invoked Gandhian philosophy, arguing that peaceful defiance of unjust laws should not be viewed as criminal incitement or violence.
2. How did the Supreme Court respond to the Gandhian argument?
The Supreme Court asked the defense to justify how Gandhian ideals align with events involving violence and emphasized balancing free speech with public order.
3. Why is the Delhi riots case significant?
It tests the boundaries between free speech, dissent, and public order, setting potential legal precedents for future protest-related cases.
4. What’s next in the Delhi riots case?
The next hearing will review evidence admissibility and the intent behind protest participation, expected to shape the final verdict trajectory.
Published on : 3rd November
Published by : RAHAMATH
www.vizzve.com || www.vizzveservices.com
Follow us on social media: Facebook || Linkedin || Instagram
🛡 Powered by Vizzve Financial
RBI-Registered Loan Partner | 10 Lakh+ Customers | ₹600 Cr+ Disbursed