New Delhi: Congress MP Manish Tewari has strongly criticized the Election Commission of India (ECI), claiming that the poll body has no constitutional mandate to conduct a pan-India Sample Inspection Report (SIR). His remarks come amid growing debates on the transparency and scope of the ECI’s electoral oversight.
Tewari stated that the ECI’s jurisdiction is limited to conducting and supervising elections, as outlined in the Constitution. According to him, extending its role into conducting nationwide sample inspections goes beyond its legislative powers.
In a series of statements, Tewari emphasized that the ECI must operate strictly within constitutional boundaries, warning that any overreach could “set a dangerous precedent for future electoral processes.”
Political analysts believe Tewari’s comments highlight an ongoing tug-of-war between political accountability and institutional autonomy in India. They also underline the increasing public scrutiny of electoral mechanisms amid the 2024 general election aftermath.
The Election Commission has not yet issued a formal response to Tewari’s criticism. However, sources within the Commission reportedly claim that the SIR initiative aims to enhance transparency and build voter confidence through random verification of poll data.
Tewari, however, maintains that no legal framework currently empowers the ECI to launch such a large-scale survey across India. “If this continues, it could erode the credibility of the institution itself,” he warned.
Observers say the controversy could fuel parliamentary debate over electoral reforms and the extent of ECI’s independence.
FAQ Section:
Q1. What did Manish Tewari say about the ECI’s mandate?
A1. Manish Tewari claimed that the Election Commission of India does not have the constitutional authority to conduct a pan-India Sample Inspection Report (SIR).
Q2. What is the purpose of the SIR by ECI?
A2. The ECI says the Sample Inspection Report aims to improve transparency by verifying election data, though critics argue it exceeds its mandate.
Q3. Why is this statement significant?
A3. It raises questions about the balance of power between electoral institutions and legislative oversight in India.
Q4. Has the Election Commission responded to Tewari’s comments?
A4. As of now, the ECI has not officially responded, but internal sources maintain that the SIR initiative aligns with efforts to boost electoral trust.
Q5. How has this topic trended online?
A5. The debate has gained traction across major news outlets and social media, making it one of the top-trending political discussions on Google News, as reported by Vizzve Finance.
Published on : 5TH November
Published by : SARANYA
www.vizzve.com || www.vizzveservices.com
Follow us on social media: Facebook || Linkedin || Instagram
🛡 Powered by Vizzve Financial
RBI-Registered Loan Partner | 10 Lakh+ Customers | ₹600 Cr+ Disbursed