In a high-profile legal development, the CEO of HDFC Bank has approached the Supreme Court of India seeking an urgent hearing to quash a First Information Report (FIR) filed against him by Lilavati Hospital.
The petition argues that the FIR is malicious, factually baseless, and allegedly driven by personal or institutional vendetta.
⚖️ Background of the Case
The FIR was registered at the instance of Lilavati Hospital, a reputed medical institution in Mumbai.
It reportedly involves allegations of misconduct and interference in matters related to hospital affairs.
Sources suggest the dispute may be linked to financial or administrative decisions involving influential stakeholders.
📝 What the HDFC Bank CEO’s Petition Claims
The FIR is abuse of legal process and meant to harass the petitioner.
No prima facie case exists to warrant a criminal trial.
The matter is civil or institutional in nature, and does not merit criminal proceedings.
🏛️ Legal Route So Far
The CEO had earlier approached the Bombay High Court for relief, but the matter did not result in immediate quashing.
Now, citing urgency, a petition has been moved before the Supreme Court, seeking a stay and quashing of the FIR under Article 32/226.
📌 Why This Matters
This case puts a spotlight on the growing legal entanglements involving India's top corporates and institutions.
It also raises important questions about the use of criminal law in corporate or civil disputes.
FAQ Section
Q1: Why did the HDFC Bank CEO approach the Supreme Court?
A: The HDFC Bank CEO approached the Supreme Court seeking an urgent hearing to quash an FIR filed by Lilavati Hospital, which he claims is baseless and filed with malicious intent.
Q2: What is the FIR filed by Lilavati Hospital about?
A: While specific details remain confidential, the FIR reportedly involves allegations of misconduct or interference in administrative or financial affairs related to Lilavati Hospital.
Q3: Was this case heard in the High Court before reaching the Supreme Court?
A: Yes, the CEO had earlier approached the Bombay High Court for relief, but with no conclusive outcome, prompting an urgent appeal to the Supreme Court.
Q4: What legal grounds are being used to seek the FIR’s quashing?
A: The CEO’s legal team is invoking Article 32 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC, citing abuse of process and absence of any prima facie criminal offense.
Published on : 3rd july
Published : SMITA
www.vizzve.com || www.vizzveservices.com
Follow us on social media: Facebook || Linkedin || Instagram
🛡 Powered by Vizzve Financial
RBI-Registered Loan Partner | 10 Lakh+ Customers | ₹600 Cr+ Disbursed.