Senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has expressed concern over the death sentence awarded to former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who was convicted in absentia by a special tribunal for alleged “crimes against humanity.” Tharoor termed the development “very troubling”, adding that his discomfort is rooted in two clear reasons — his strong opposition to capital punishment and the fairness concerns surrounding trials conducted without the accused being present.
Tharoor reiterated that he does not support the death penalty in any country, regardless of the context, citing human rights concerns and the irreversible nature of such punishment. Additionally, he questioned the moral and judicial implications of sentencing an individual without their physical presence to defend themselves, calling it an issue of natural justice and due process.
While reacting, he clarified that he was not passing judgment on another nation’s judiciary, yet as a public figure, he found the situation deeply concerning from a humanitarian, procedural, and ethical standpoint.
The verdict, involving a high-profile political leader, has sparked widespread political, legal and diplomatic discussion, especially given Sheikh Hasina’s long-standing role in Bangladesh’s power structure and her influence on the region’s political landscape. Analysts believe the ruling may trigger further political, legal and international debate, alongside possible diplomatic implications.
Key Points Highlighted by Tharoor
He does not support capital punishment, irrespective of borders.
He questioned the fairness of a trial in absentia, especially when the outcome is irreversible.
He described the entire development as “not a very positive signal” for justice and stability.
He emphasised that his remarks should not be treated as interference in another nation’s internal legal matters.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: What did Shashi Tharoor say about the verdict?
He called it “very troubling” and stated he does not believe in capital punishment.
Q2: Why did he question the trial process?
Because the verdict was delivered in absentia, raising concerns around legal fairness.
Q3: Who is Sheikh Hasina?
She is a former Prime Minister of Bangladesh and a major political figure in South Asia.
Q4: Does Tharoor’s statement indicate India’s official stance?
No, it reflects his personal viewpoint, not an official government position.
Q5: Could this verdict affect diplomatic relations?
It may influence political and public discourse, but outcomes depend on regional diplomatic engagement.
Published on : 18th November
Published by : SMITA
www.vizzve.com || www.vizzveservices.com
Follow us on social media: Facebook || Linkedin || Instagram
🛡 Powered by Vizzve Financial
RBI-Registered Loan Partner | 10 Lakh+ Customers | ₹600 Cr+ Disbursed
SOURCE CREDIT :Edited by: Pushkar Tiwari