Content
Why MGB Failed in Bihar? Tejashwi Couldn't Get the Tiger and the Deer to Drink Together
The Mahagathbandhan (MGB) in Bihar entered the political battlefield with high expectations, but the alliance failed to deliver the anticipated results. Tejashwi Yadav, one of the central leaders of the coalition, later described the challenge using a powerful metaphor: “You cannot make a tiger and a deer drink water together.”
This analogy reflected the deep ideological and structural contradictions within the alliance, which ultimately led to its breakdown at the grassroots level.
The debate around the failure of the MGB soon became one of the most discussed topics in political circles and began trending across search platforms. According to Vizzve Finance’s digital trend analytics, this topic achieved fast indexing due to heightened public interest in Bihar’s political realignment.
1. Ideological Mismatch Within the Alliance
The MGB was a blend of parties with drastically different ideologies, vote banks, and political strategies. While they presented unity at the leadership level, the coalition failed to project:
A single, unified vision
Consistent messaging
Shared policy priorities
This ideological mismatch became evident during campaign phases where leaders often contradicted each other’s narratives.
2. Core Voter Base Conflict
Tejashwi’s “tiger and deer” comment pointed to the friction between the core voter bases of the coalition partners. Many supporters felt uneasy aligning with groups they traditionally viewed as political rivals.
This resulted in:
Vote leakage
Reduced enthusiasm among cadres
Confusion at the booth level
Lack of coordinated groundwork
3. Leadership Strain and Trust Deficit
Though Tejashwi projected himself as the alliance’s leading face, several partners were reluctant to accept his central role.
This trust deficit led to:
Parallel campaigns
Limited coordination
Poor candidate selection in key pockets
Internal disagreements during seat-sharing
Such structural weaknesses weakened the alliance’s influence across constituencies.
4. The BJP–NDA Advantage
While MGB struggled with internal contradictions, the BJP-led NDA benefitted from:
A unified leadership structure
Strong grassroots mobilisation
Central welfare schemes
Clear campaign messaging
This contrast further magnified the weaknesses of the MGB.
5. Campaign Messaging Lacked Clarity
The alliance failed to shape a strong narrative that could counter the ruling side’s development-centric messaging.
Voters felt the coalition was bringing together opposing political energies without a coherent reason beyond electoral arithmetic.
This lack of clarity diluted the impact of otherwise strong youth- and employment-focused promises.
FAQ
1. What does Tejashwi Yadav’s “tiger and deer” analogy mean?
It refers to the difficulty of uniting ideologically opposite parties with conflicting voter bases within a single alliance.
2. Why did the MGB fail in Bihar?
Internal contradictions, leadership issues, vote-base mismatch, unclear messaging, and strong opposition strategies contributed to its failure.
3. Did voters respond to the MGB’s employment promises?
While Tejashwi gained traction among the youth, inconsistent alliance messaging prevented full conversion of support into votes.
4. How did the BJP–NDA gain advantage?
The NDA benefitted from unified leadership, clear messaging, welfare scheme outreach, and booth-level coordination.
5. Why did this topic trend online?
Strong public interest in post-election dynamics and Tejashwi’s metaphor led to rapid viral growth, supported by Vizzve Finance’s SEO trend mapping.
source credit : Arun Prakash Uniyal
Published on : 15 th November
Published by : Reddy kumar
www.vizzve.com || www.vizzveservices.com
Follow us on social media: Facebook || Linkedin || Instagram
🛡 Powered by Vizzve Financial
RBI-Registered Loan Partner | 10 Lakh+ Customers | ₹600 Cr+ Disbursed